home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text>
- <title>
- Egyptian Foreign Minister's Statement, Oct. 30, 1991
- </title>
- <article>
- <hdr>
- Foreign Policy Bulletin, November/December 1991
- The Madrid Middle East Peace Conference, October 30-November 1,
- 1991. Egyptian Foreign Minister Amre Moussa, October 30.
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> (Excerpt) Egypt at one of its finest moments, 1973, called
- for peace; in 1977, pioneered the march toward peace; in 1979,
- endorsed this peace with Israel. Throughout our tireless and
- undaunting efforts for peace, our position has always been and
- will always be grounded in our commitment to international
- legitimacy, to the U.N. Charter and its resolutions. Today we
- are all the more devoted to the same principles unchanged and
- unnegotiable.
- </p>
- <p> Ladies and gentlemen, peace, which we intend to establish,
- to consolidate and safeguard, should be built on the formula
- land for peace as reflected in Security Council Resolution 242
- which unequivocally reaffirmed the inherent principle of the
- U.N. Charter on the inadmissability of acquisition of
- territories by force, and the rights of all states to live in
- peace and security.
- </p>
- <p> This peace is based on a number of fundamentals, basics and
- factors. It means right for right, obligation for obligation,
- security for security, sovereignty for sovereignty. In our
- conviction, this and only this can fulfill the formula peace for
- peace.
- </p>
- <p> It is inconceivable that principles long endorsed and
- internationally accepted would be renegotiated or reinterpreted,
- or outbid. Complete withdrawal from all Arab territories
- occupied in 1967--in the West Bank including East Jerusalem,
- Gaza, the Syrian Golan Heights pursuant to Security Council
- Resolution 242, and also from Southern Lebanon pursuant to
- Security Council Resolution 425--is the right prelude to
- promote a genuine peace with justice and dignity. Arab rights
- to Arab territories cannot be compromised.
- </p>
- <p> Recognition of the legitimate rights of the Palestinian
- people is the prime assurance for peaceful coexistence of
- Israelis, Palestinians, indeed the Arabs in their respective
- homelands.
- </p>
- <p> Arabs did not come to relinquish their rights, accepted,
- endorsed and supported by rules of international law, principles
- of justice, U.N. Charter, resolutions and world consensus, nor
- did they come to concede their commitments to these principles
- and norms. They came in search, in good faith, with mutual
- trust, for a common ground for acceptable formulas on how to
- meet concerns, reconcile different demands, reach agreements
- and modalities that would secure the legitimate requirements of
- all parties equitably and without prejudice to the rights of any
- party. We call upon Israel to do the same.
- </p>
- <p> Ladies and gentlemen, launching this historic peace process
- should not be fettered with obstacles impeding its steady
- evolution towards a comprehensive permanent settlement. Basic
- fundamental requirements have to be respected and met.
- </p>
- <p> First: The legal status of the Palestinian people should not
- be challenged. They are not just proprietors, inhabitants or
- residents of conquered territories. They are people with
- history, culture, distinct national identity worthy of all the
- attributes of other peoples.
- </p>
- <p> Second: The West Bank, Gaza and Golan Heights are occupied
- Arab territories subject to the full implementation of Security
- Council Resolutions 242. They are not also conquered
- territories. They are not lands promised to other peoples. They
- have their legitimate sovereigns. Claims not based on principles
- of legitimacy and international law, have no place in the world
- of today.
- </p>
- <p> Third: Settlements established in territories occupied since
- 1967, including Jerusalem, are illegal and more settlements will
- foreclose potential progress towards real peace, cast doubts on
- the credibility of the process itself. They have to be stopped
- as they obstruct peace, undermine the groundwork for
- negotiations on the final status of the occupied territories and
- erode the will to coexist.
- </p>
- <p> Fourth: The Holy City of Jerusalem has its special status.
- It should remain free, accessible and sacred to all followers
- of Islam, Christianity and Judaism. The occupying power should
- not exercise monopoly, illegal sovereignty over this holy city.
- Persistence of unilateral decisions declared by occupying power
- to annex the Holy City lacks any validity or legitimacy. The
- status of the Holy City should be subject to negotiations and
- settled by agreement in the context of legitimacy established
- by internationally accepted resolutions.
- </p>
- <p> The Arab-Israeli dispute is in essence an Israeli-Palestinian
- conflict. Any breakthrough or progress depends on the settlement
- of the question of Palestine, in terms of rights and
- territories. It also requires termination of the Israeli
- occupation of the Syrian territories occupied in 1967 and
- Israeli withdrawal to Syrian international borders. Progress
- towards attainment of these objectives should be guided by
- rationality and wisdom. It should achieve justice and equity
- within the context of balanced rights and obligations on the
- basis of international legitimacy--conscious, and with clear
- understanding, of the historical developments.
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-